Insert after ""Jesus Christ" and before "'consubstantial": '''con substantial with God and His Father according to His divine nature and", number 296.
Also the following for the last six lines but one: ""if he accepts such an expression as this with regard to the mystery of Christ, or, acknowledg ing a number of natures in the same one Lord our Jesus Christ the Word of God made 11esh, but does not accept the difference of these of which He is also com posed, which is not destroyed by the union (for one is from both, and through one both), but in this uses number in such a way", number 257.
CORRIGENDA (The Sources of Catholic Dogma), number 74, read: "is true God" for ""is not true God.", number 111 a from lines 3 through 6 read: "'that the Word, in an ineffable and inconceivable manner, having hypostatically united to Himself flesh animated by a rational soul, became Man and was called the Son of Man," also lines 11 through 14, read: ""For it was no ordinary man who was first born of the Holy Virgin and upon whom the Word afterwards descended but being united from the wornb itself He is said to have undergone fleshly birth, claiming as His own the birth of His own flesh.", number 148, second column, line 15, read: ""nowhere removed" for "removed.", number 218, read: "but not as if the word of God" for "'but as if the Word of God.", number 219, substitute the following for the first three lines: "If anyone speaking on two natures does not confess that our Lord Jesus Christ is acknowledged as in His Divinity as well as in His Manhood, in order that by this he may signify the dif ference of the natures in which".
0 kommentar(er)
